To summarize: fractally dumb. Astonishingly, breath-takingly bad:
- Painful, terrible writing. Shocking to us that editors of a major publisher would sign off on this.
- Sneaky, creepy sexism. Not as blatantly bad as the puerile wish-fulfillment of "Lives of Tao", but maybe worse for that. Normalizes/excuses abusive, controlling behavior.
- Dumb, dumb, a thousand times dumb. Science, logic, continuity, common sense: leave them behind.
- The cleverest suggestion put forth is that this is actually an ironic work: a poorly-executed, derivative novel about ineptly ripping off the past. Clever! We don't buy it, though.
- Shockingly little time-travel, really.
- I would like to pass a law that when characters do/say something unnecessary purely to drive home that they are villains, they must twirl their moustaches, whether or not that makes sense.
- Despite our opinion of the book, a discussion full of laughter. And groaning.
- We are now completely cynical about blurbs and reviews.
Next time we're reading Charlie Jane Anders' "All the Birds in the Sky", which narrowly edged out Jeff VanderMeer's "Southern Reach" trilogy. Clearly, we are craving the good stuff.
Also, a reminder: lots of Chicago Nerd stuff coming up, including C2E2-related events and Pi Day. Keep up to date via the CNSC website and Facebook.
Now I _really_ wish I'd been able to make this one. I thought the book was bad too and nothing's more fun than when the discussion turns into a roast.
ReplyDeleteWe missed you!
ReplyDelete